Romantic comedies, especially those set during Christmas, thrive on warmth, charm, and a sprinkle of holiday magic. Unfortunately, The Merry Gentlemen, directed by Peter Sullivan, offers little of these qualities. Despite an intriguing premise and a seemingly capable cast, the film stumbles under the weight of uninspired direction, awkward pacing, and a lack of chemistry between its leads. What could have been a delightful seasonal romp instead feels like a hollow, formulaic experience that neither entertains nor uplifts.

Ambition Meets Amateur Execution:
The story follows Ashley (Britt Robertson), a Broadway dancer whose career faces uncertainty. Returning to her quaint hometown for the holidays, she discovers her parents’ performing venue is on the brink of closure. To save it, Ashley organizes an all-male Christmas revue, which she hopes will bring in enough funds to keep the lights on. Along the way, she meets Luke (Chad Michael Murray), a carpenter and reluctant participant in her show, whose guarded demeanor masks his own struggles.
At first glance, the premise is promising. The backdrop of small-town charm and the unique twist of a male revue set against Christmas festivities could have been a recipe for quirky fun. However, The Merry Gentlemen suffers from a lack of focus, failing to balance its comedic and romantic elements effectively. The revue itself is relegated to a subplot, undermining the very premise that should have driven the narrative forward.
Lackluster Leads:
Britt Robertson, known for her charisma in projects like Tomorrowland, struggles to inject Ashley with the energy and spark needed to carry the film. Ashley’s character feels one-dimensional, a woman whose motivations seem dictated more by the script than by any genuine emotional arc. Robertson’s attempts to portray Ashley’s passion for dance and her family’s theater come across as half-hearted, leaving the audience disconnected.
Chad Michael Murray, meanwhile, is miscast as Luke. While his rugged, small-town carpenter vibe aligns with the archetype of a Christmas rom-com love interest, his performance lacks nuance. Luke’s character is written as brooding yet kind-hearted, but Murray’s flat delivery makes it difficult to empathize with him. Even his moments of vulnerability feel forced, robbing the character of depth. Worse still, Murray and Robertson fail to establish believable chemistry, an essential ingredient for any romantic comedy. Their interactions feel awkward and stilted, with dialogue that lacks wit or genuine emotion.
A Muddled Mess:
Peter Sullivan’s direction is uneven at best. While he attempts to weave elements of romance, comedy, and family drama, the film suffers from a tonal inconsistency that leaves it feeling disjointed. Scenes oscillate between saccharine sentimentality and tepid humor without ever finding a cohesive rhythm. Moments meant to elicit laughter often fall flat, while the romantic beats lack the emotional weight to resonate.
The pacing is another major issue. The first act drags as it overexplains Ashley’s predicament and sets up Luke’s introduction. The middle act attempts to juggle multiple subplots—the revue, Ashley’s relationship with her estranged parents, and Luke’s mysterious past—but none receive enough attention to feel fully developed. By the time the revue finally takes center stage in the final act, the buildup feels rushed and underwhelming.
A Hollow Christmas Spirit:
Christmas-themed films often rely on holiday aesthetics and themes of love, community, and redemption to captivate audiences. The Merry Gentlemen fails to capitalize on these elements. The depiction of Ashley’s small town feels generic, lacking the cozy, festive atmosphere that should envelop the story. The Christmas revue, which should have been a dazzling highlight, is poorly choreographed and uninspired, offering little payoff for the audience’s investment.
Moreover, the film’s exploration of holiday themes is superficial. While Ashley’s efforts to save her parents’ theater provide a semblance of stakes, the emotional core feels hollow. The strained relationship between Ashley and her parents is touched upon but never meaningfully explored, robbing the story of the emotional resonance it desperately needs. Similarly, Luke’s subplot—a missed opportunity to inject depth—fizzles out without offering a satisfying conclusion.
Technical Shortcomings:
The film’s technical aspects do little to elevate its lackluster narrative. The cinematography is bland, with uninspired framing and a washed-out color palette that fails to evoke the warmth and magic of the holiday season. The production design is similarly underwhelming, with the theater and town settings feeling more like generic backdrops than lived-in spaces.
The soundtrack, an essential element in any Christmas film, is forgettable. While there are a few attempts to incorporate festive tunes, they lack impact, blending into the background without enhancing the story’s mood. Even the moments featuring Ashley’s choreography are hampered by mediocre editing and uninspired musical choices.
A Few Bright Spots:
Despite its many flaws, The Merry Gentlemen isn’t entirely without merit. There are brief glimpses of charm in the interactions between Ashley and the revue participants. These men, though underdeveloped as characters, occasionally provide moments of levity that hint at what the film could have been with sharper writing and better direction. Additionally, the premise of a Broadway dancer returning to her roots and blending her professional experience with small-town life holds untapped potential, suggesting that a more focused script could have yielded better results.
Overall:
Ultimately, The Merry Gentlemen falls victim to the pitfalls of many made-for-TV Christmas movies: an overreliance on clichés, underdeveloped characters, and a lack of genuine heart. While its premise had the potential to set it apart, the execution leaves it indistinguishable from countless other holiday rom-coms churned out each year.
The Merry Gentlemen is a forgettable addition to the Christmas rom-com genre. Britt Robertson and Chad Michael Murray struggle to bring life to a script that feels half-baked, while Peter Sullivan’s direction fails to capture the magic or emotional resonance necessary to make the film memorable. Its muddled narrative, lack of compelling chemistry, and uninspired technical execution make it a disappointing watch for even the most forgiving holiday movie fans.

Acting – 4/10

Cinematography/Visual Effects – 3/10

Plot/Screenplay – 3/10

Setting/Theme – 3/10

Watchability – 2/10

Rewatchability – 1/10

User Review

2
(1 vote)

.review-total-box {
display: block;
}
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .user-review-area .review-percentage,
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .user-review-area .review-point {
width: 20%;
float: right;
margin-top: 5px;
}
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper.wp-review-circle-type .review-total-wrapper .review-circle.review-total {
margin: auto 0;
padding-top: 15px;
width: auto;
height: 100%;
clear: both;
}
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper.wp-review-circle-type .review-total-wrapper > .review-total-box {
display: block;
}
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper.wp-review-circle-type .review-total-wrapper > .review-total-box > div { display: none; }
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .review-total-wrapper .review-total-box h5 {
color: inherit;
}
.wp-review-998718 .review-embed-code { padding: 7px 30px 15px; }
.wp-review-998718 .review-embed-code #wp_review_embed_code { background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5) }
.wp-review-998718 .wpr-rating-accept-btn {
background: #e57e34;
background: linear-gradient(to top, #e57e34, #f08436);
color: #000000;
margin: 10px 30px 12px;
width: -moz-calc(100% – 60px);
width: -webkit-calc(100% – 60px);
width: -o-calc(100% – 60px);
width: calc(100% – 60px);
border-radius: 50px;
}
@media screen and (max-width:600px) {
.wp-review-998718.wp-review-point-type .review-list li .review-point,
.wp-review-998718.wp-review-percentage-type .review-list li .review-percentage {
width: 40%;
}
.wp-review-998718.wp-review-point-type .review-list li .wp-review-user-rating .review-point,
.wp-review-998718.wp-review-percentage-type .review-list li .wp-review-user-rating .review-percentage {
width: 100%;
}
.wp-review-998718.wp-review-point-type .wpr-user-features-rating .review-list li span,
.wp-review-998718.wp-review-percentage-type .wpr-user-features-rating .review-list li span {
float: left;
line-height: 1.4;
font-size: 14px;
}
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .review-pros-cons .review-pros {
padding: 15px 30px;
}
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .review-pros-cons .review-cons {
padding: 15px 30px;
padding-top: 0;
}
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .user-total-wrapper {
max-width: 100%;
float: left;
}
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper.wp-review-circle-type .user-total-wrapper { max-width: 70%; }
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .user-total-wrapper h5,
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .user-total-wrapper .user-review-title { font-size: 14px; }
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .user-review-area .review-percentage,
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .user-review-area .review-point {
width: 50.5%;
}
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .review-links { padding: 15px 30px 5px; }
}
@media screen and (max-width: 480px) {
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .reviewed-item,
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .review-desc { padding: 15px; }
.wp-review-998718 .review-list li,
.wp-review-998718.wp-review-point-type .review-list li,
.wp-review-998718.wp-review-percentage-type .review-list li,
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .wpr-user-features-rating .user-review-title,
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .user-review-area,
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .review-pros-cons .review-pros,
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .review-pros-cons .review-cons,
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .review-links,
.wp-review-998718.review-wrapper .review-embed-code { padding: 12px 15px; }
}
]]>